Back-to-Back Terms
Back-to-back terms means the promises you make to your customers are backed by matching promises from your vendors, so you never commit to more (faster notice, higher uptime, wider liability) than your own vendors commit to you.
What are back-to-back terms?
Back-to-back terms means the promises you make to your customers are matched by the promises your vendors make to you. If you promise a customer something that depends on a vendor, the vendor's contract should promise you at least the same.
The gap appears when you promise more than you receive. Say you tell customers you will report a security incident within 24 hours. Your hosting provider only promises to tell you "without undue delay". You now carry a promise you may not be able to keep.
Data protection law builds in one version of this idea. Under GDPR Article 28(4), a processor must pass the same data protection duties down to each subprocessor it uses, and it stays fully liable to its customer if that subprocessor fails. These passed-down duties are called flow-down obligations.
Why it matters to you
Your customers hold you to your contract, not to your vendor's. If a vendor misses a deadline, cuts a benefit or changes its terms, you still owe your customer what you promised.
Common gaps show up in a few places:
- Breach notice. Atlassian's DPA promises notice "without undue delay" and, where feasible, within 72 hours (Atlassian DPA, section 3.2). A 24 hour promise to your customer would be tighter than that.
- Subprocessor notice. If you promise customers 30 days' notice, but a vendor you rely on gives less, you may learn of a change too late to pass it on.
- Uptime and service credits. Your SLA to customers cannot be safely higher than the SLAs of the services you run on.
- Liability. If you accept unlimited liability for data loss, but your vendor caps its own at a few months of fees, the difference is yours to pay. See limitation of liability.
Vendor changes can open a gap after you signed. For example, Venpo flagged that Meta dropped the 30-day notice from its WhatsApp Business terms: Meta can now end the agreement at any time on notice, instead of giving 30 days' written notice. If you promise customers support over WhatsApp, that promise now rests on a shorter one from Meta.
What to check
- List the promises in your own customer contract and DPA: breach notice hours, uptime, subprocessor notice, data deletion timing, data location.
- For each one, find the matching promise in your key vendors' DPA, SLA or terms. Write down any gap.
- Where you find a gap, either soften your own promise or ask the vendor for a stronger one.
- Check the liability cap in each key vendor contract against the liability you accept from customers.
- Recheck after any vendor terms change, since a vendor can shorten a notice period or remove a promise at renewal.
How Venpo helps
Venpo emails you a plain-English alert when a vendor's terms, DPA, SLA or subprocessor list changes, including when a notice period or a promise is cut. That shows you when a promise you made to your own customers has lost its backing.
Frequently asked questions
What does back to back mean in a contract?
It means the terms you give one party are mirrored by the terms you get from another. In software, it usually means your customer promises are backed by matching vendor promises.
Are back-to-back terms required by law?
Not in general. For EU personal data, GDPR Article 28(4) does require a processor to pass the same data protection duties down to its subprocessors.
Related terms
Sources
Last reviewed