Transfer Impact Assessment (TIA)
A transfer impact assessment (TIA) is a documented check, made before personal data leaves the EU under SCCs or BCRs, of whether the destination country's laws and practices let the recipient keep its data protection promises.
What is a transfer impact assessment (TIA)?
A transfer impact assessment (TIA) is a written check you make before sending personal data out of the EU under a transfer tool such as standard contractual clauses (SCCs) or binding corporate rules (BCRs). It checks whether the laws and practices of the destination country let the recipient keep the promises in that tool, above all where public authorities can demand access to the data.
The GDPR does not use the name. The duty comes from the 2020 Schrems II ruling, which said companies relying on SCCs must check the destination case by case. The European Data Protection Board (EDPB) set out how in its Recommendations 01/2020, final since June 18, 2021. They describe six steps:
- Know your transfers, including onward transfers to subprocessors and remote access from abroad, such as support staff.
- Identify the transfer tool each transfer relies on.
- Assess whether that tool works in practice, given the destination's laws and practices.
- Adopt supplementary measures if it does not.
- Take any procedural steps those measures require.
- Re-evaluate at appropriate intervals.
You must document the assessment and make it available to the data protection authority on request. A transfer covered by an adequacy decision needs no TIA. That includes transfers to US companies certified under the EU-US Data Privacy Framework.
The UK version
In the UK it is called a transfer risk assessment (TRA), and the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025, in force for transfers since February 5, 2026, now calls it the "data protection test." The ICO says you must complete one before relying on a safeguard such as the UK Addendum. The test is whether protection after the transfer is "not materially lower" than in the UK.
What it looks like in a vendor's terms
The 2021 SCCs build the assessment into Clause 14, and a DPA may repeat its warranty in its own words. A typical clause reads like this:
As of the Effective Date, Provider has no reason to believe that the laws and practices of any country where it processes Customer Personal Data prevent it from meeting its obligations under this DPA. Provider will promptly notify Customer if it becomes subject to such laws, including through a request for disclosure from a public authority.
- "No reason to believe": the vendor's warranty, which mirrors Clause 14(a). It is a statement, not the assessment itself.
- "Promptly notify": your cue to act. Under Clause 14(f), the exporter must suspend the transfer if it cannot ensure appropriate safeguards.
The Salesforce Data Processing Addendum has an "Impact of Local Laws" section in this form. If Salesforce cannot offer a workable change, you may terminate the affected services and get a refund of prepaid fees for the period after termination.
Why it matters to you
When you send personal data to a vendor outside the EU, you are usually the data exporter, so the TIA is your document. The EDPB says a regulator may ask for it and hold you accountable for any decision you base on it.
If a cloud provider needs your data in the clear to do its job, and the destination's laws let authorities go beyond what is necessary and proportionate, the EDPB says it cannot envision an effective technical measure. Transport and storage encryption do not count as a supplementary measure if the vendor holds the keys.
A TIA also goes stale. A new subprocessor in another country, a new data center or a new law can change the answer, which is why step 6 exists.
What to check
- The vendor's input: ask for its TIA material or a summary of the laws it is subject to. Under Clause 14(c), the importer warrants it has made its best efforts to give you relevant information.
- Where data goes: the countries on the subprocessor list, plus any support access from abroad.
- The tool per recipient: SCCs, BCRs or the Data Privacy Framework. A certified US recipient needs no TIA; a US recipient on SCCs does.
- Government requests: the vendor's transparency report. The EDPB says a lack of past requests is never decisive on its own.
- Supplementary measures: who holds the encryption keys, and whether data can be pseudonymized before it leaves.
- Review date: when you will look again, and what triggers an earlier review.
How Venpo helps
Step 6 asks you to watch for changes, and some of them show up in a vendor's own documents: a new subprocessor in another country, a changed transfer clause in the DPA. Venpo watches your vendors' DPAs, subprocessor lists and other public legal pages and emails you a plain-English alert when they change. The Fine Print Scan also answers, per vendor, whether your data goes to China or other restricted countries.
Frequently asked questions
Is a transfer impact assessment required by the GDPR?
The GDPR does not name it, but Schrems II and Clause 14 of the 2021 SCCs require the assessment for transfers that rely on SCCs, and the EDPB applies the same logic to BCRs. Transfers under an adequacy decision do not need one.
What is the difference between a TIA and a DPIA?
A DPIA looks at the risks a processing activity poses to people. A TIA looks only at whether the destination country's laws undercut a transfer tool. One project can need both.
Who does the TIA, the customer or the vendor?
The data exporter, which is usually you as the customer. The SCCs commit the vendor, as importer, to make its best efforts to give you the information you need.
Do I need a TIA for US vendors?
Not for a US company certified under the Data Privacy Framework, which is an adequacy decision. You do for a US vendor that relies on SCCs, though the Commission says the US safeguards behind the framework also apply to those transfers.
How often should a TIA be updated?
The EDPB says to monitor developments on an ongoing basis and re-evaluate at appropriate intervals. A new subprocessor country, a new law or a vendor notice under Clause 14 are natural triggers.
Related terms
Sources
- EDPB Recommendations 01/2020 on measures that supplement transfer tools (final, June 18, 2021)
- European Commission: New Standard Contractual Clauses, Questions and Answers
- Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/914 (the 2021 SCCs, including Clause 14)
- European Commission: EU-US data transfers
- ICO: What's a transfer risk assessment (TRA)?
- EDPB Recommendations 1/2022 on controller BCRs (Section 5.4.1, local laws)
- Salesforce Data Processing Addendum (revision August 2026)
- The Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 (Commencement No. 6 and Transitional and Saving Provisions) Regulations 2026 (SI 2026/82): transfer provisions in force February 5, 2026
Last reviewed