Carve-Out Method (Subservice Organizations)
The carve-out method is how a SOC report leaves out the controls of a vendor's own providers, such as its cloud host. The report names those providers, but the auditor does not test their controls, so you need other evidence for them.
What is the carve-out method?
Most vendors rely on other companies to run their service, such as a cloud host or a data warehouse. In a SOC report these are called subservice organizations. In privacy terms many of them are subprocessors.
A SOC report can treat them in two ways (AICPA):
- Carve-out method: the report names the provider and what it does, but leaves its controls out of scope.
- Inclusive method: the provider's relevant controls are treated as part of the vendor's own system and covered by the report. This needs the provider to cooperate.
Under carve-out, the report lists controls the vendor assumes the provider runs, called complementary subservice organization controls. For example, the vendor assumes its cloud host runs physical and environmental controls at its data centers. Nobody in this report tested that.
Why it matters to you
Carve-out leaves a gap in what was examined. The vendor is still expected to oversee those providers, most often by getting and reviewing their own SOC reports. If a carved-out provider holds your data, you may want that evidence too. For a small company, a practical approach is to review the main hosts and accept the rest as fourth-party risk.
The list of subservice organizations is fixed to the audit period. The vendor's subprocessor list keeps changing. For example, Stripe added Microsoft Azure and Snowflake as cloud subprocessors. A provider added after the audit period will not appear in the report at all.
What to check
- Find the subservice organizations in the system description and note which method the report uses for each.
- Compare that list with the vendor's current subprocessor list. Ask about any provider in one list but not the other.
- For carved-out providers that hold your data, get their own SOC report or a public summary.
- Read the complementary subservice organization controls, so you know what the vendor is assuming.
- Check that your DPA makes the vendor responsible for its subprocessors.
How Venpo helps
Venpo monitors your vendors' subprocessor lists and emails you in plain English when a provider is added or removed. That shows you when the list has moved past what the last SOC report covered.
Frequently asked questions
Is carve-out a red flag in a SOC 2 report?
No. It is a normal way to handle cloud hosts and other providers. It just means you need separate evidence for those providers.
Is a subservice organization the same as a subprocessor?
They overlap but are not the same. A subservice organization matters to the vendor's controls, while a subprocessor processes personal data, and many providers are both.
Related terms
Sources
Last reviewed